🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document presents a flawed view of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "woke" policies pose an grave risk to European civilization. However, this perspective rests on a serious misreading of the situation. The true challenge facing Europe is not societal but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Economic Gap Between Europe and the US

Statistics paint a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by eighty-seven percent, while a mere 13.5% increase for the EU. During this period, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Today, roughly half of the global top fifty technology firms are American, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Deficit: A Critical Problem

The growing disparity is driven by stronger efficiency gains in the US, largely due to breakthroughs and better use of resources. The scene of world technology leadership is decidedly American. In the last fifty years, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in Europe.

This gap prompts a pressing issue: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, where does the EU stand? Experts widely agree it is largely a two-horse race involving the US and China, with European nations starting at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Innovation Gap

A number of key factors explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and more dynamic network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, which caps the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper European business. A American entrepreneur can launch a service under one set of laws to access a market of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a bigger population size, is split among 27 different national regimes, creating significant internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically met with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has eroded its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, there are reasons for optimism. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to advance substantial change. Notable reports on European competitiveness and the internal market point to the need for sweeping changes.

Given appropriate policies and rule changes, these assets might enable far greater levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses significant strengths: high-quality human capital, excellent schools and universities, and world-class labs. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations could unleash a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly increase economic output by implementing and tailoring advancements from other regions.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now stands at a decisive moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, Europe's technological decline has been steady. However, without decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.